BAC vs UBS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Hold and UBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- BAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- UBS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was +8.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.
UBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (+1.07% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| BAC | UBS | BAC / UBS | |
| Capitalization | 299B | 98.7B | 303% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.166 | 15.765 | 39% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.18 | 3.61 | 338% |
| Revenue | 98.6B | 39.4B | 250% |
| Total Cash | 25.3B | 144B | 18% |
| Total Debt | 334B | 378B | 88% |
BAC | UBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UBS's Valuation (68) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (76). This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAC (43). This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAC’s over the last 12 months.
BAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (5). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.
BAC's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (43). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.
UBS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (26). This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.
| BAC | UBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 57% | 9 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% | 9 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 9 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 68% | 9 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 65% | 9 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 67% | 15 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 55% | 9 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 53% | N/A |
BAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.
UBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBS | 100% | +3.11% | ||
| MUFG - UBS | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.07% | ||
| RY - UBS | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| SMFG - UBS | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| C - UBS | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| BAC - UBS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||