BAC
Price
$52.33
Change
+$2.24 (+4.47%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
371.01B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SMFG
Price
$15.79
Change
+$0.26 (+1.67%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.28B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs SMFG

Header iconBAC vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$52.33
Change+$2.24 (+4.47%)
Volume$68.68K
Capitalization371.01B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$15.79
Change+$0.26 (+1.67%)
Volume$600
Capitalization98.28B
BAC vs SMFG Comparison Chart in %
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. SMFG commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Hold and SMFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $50.09 vs. SMFG: $15.53)
Brand notoriety: BAC: Notable vs. SMFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 126% vs. SMFG: 127%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $371.01B vs. SMFG: $98.28B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $371.01B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $98.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $822.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAC and SMFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAC is a better buy in the short-term than SMFG.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was -3.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.52% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($371B) has a higher market cap than SMFG($98.3B). BAC has higher P/E ratio than SMFG: BAC (14.69) vs SMFG (12.92). BAC YTD gains are higher at: 16.007 vs. SMFG (7.177). BAC has less debt than SMFG: BAC (361B) vs SMFG (31.54T). SMFG has higher revenues than BAC: SMFG (5.11T) vs BAC (105B).
BACSMFGBAC / SMFG
Capitalization371B98.3B377%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.0077.177223%
P/E Ratio14.6912.92114%
Revenue105B5.11T2%
Total Cash26.7BN/A-
Total Debt361B31.54T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3517
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5239
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFG's Valuation (71) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (77). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (35). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (1). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (54). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (52). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEBS18.530.18
+1.00%
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Int Br 3X ETF
VO291.882.29
+0.79%
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
RMM14.22N/A
N/A
RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund
GEM40.45-0.43
-1.05%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® EMkts Eq ETF
EMC30.78-0.33
-1.07%
Global X Emerging Mkts Great Cnsmr ETF

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
+2.52%
WFC - BAC
87%
Closely correlated
+7.15%
C - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
+3.89%
JPM - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
BK - BAC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
+2.29%
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
+1.37%
MUFG - SMFG
83%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
BCS - SMFG
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
C - SMFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.89%
BAC - SMFG
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
UBS - SMFG
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
More