BAC
Price
$39.78
Change
+$0.09 (+0.23%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
299.21B
78 days until earnings call
MUFG
Price
$12.66
Change
+$0.07 (+0.56%)
Updated
Apr 29, 11:04 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
116.09B
16 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAC vs MUFG

Header iconBAC vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs MUFGBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$39.78
Change+$0.09 (+0.23%)
Volume$37.43M
Capitalization299.21B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$12.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization116.09B
BAC vs MUFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. MUFG commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Buy and MUFG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $39.78 vs. MUFG: $12.59)
Brand notoriety: BAC: Notable vs. MUFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 70% vs. MUFG: 44%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $299.21B vs. MUFG: $116.09B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $299.21B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $116.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the long-term than BAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than BAC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +7.75% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was +7.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +72.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.57% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($299B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($116B). BAC has higher P/E ratio than MUFG: BAC (12.18) vs MUFG (8.85). MUFG YTD gains are higher at: 7.423 vs. BAC (-8.917). BAC has less debt than MUFG: BAC (334B) vs MUFG (48.64T). MUFG has higher revenues than BAC: MUFG (5.66T) vs BAC (98.6B).
BACMUFGBAC / MUFG
Capitalization299B116B258%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.9177.423-120%
P/E Ratio12.188.85138%
Revenue98.6B5.66T2%
Total Cash25.3BN/A-
Total Debt334B48.64T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
259
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3613
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5626
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MUFG's Valuation (60) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (72). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (36). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (1). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (59). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (56). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X94978.7500001223.914100
+1.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.590.13
+0.47%
GameStop Corp
AAPL210.140.86
+0.41%
Apple
TSLA285.880.93
+0.33%
Tesla
SPY550.850.21
+0.04%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with C. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then C could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
+0.23%
C - BAC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
WFC - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
JPM - BAC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
NTB - BAC
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
BCS - BAC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+2.61%
SMFG - MUFG
91%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
C - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
WFC - MUFG
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
BAC - MUFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
JPM - MUFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More