BAC
Price
$44.81
Change
-$0.49 (-1.08%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
299.21B
51 days until earnings call
MUFG
Price
$12.64
Change
-$0.38 (-2.92%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
116.09B
85 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAC vs MUFG

Header iconBAC vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs MUFGBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$44.81
Change-$0.49 (-1.08%)
Volume$43.49M
Capitalization299.21B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$12.64
Change-$0.38 (-2.92%)
Volume$3.13M
Capitalization116.09B
BAC vs MUFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. MUFG commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Buy and MUFG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $46.53 vs. MUFG: $13.32)
Brand notoriety: BAC: Notable vs. MUFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 114% vs. MUFG: 107%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $299.21B vs. MUFG: $116.09B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $299.21B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $116.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the long-term than BAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than BAC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was +7.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.13% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($299B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($116B). BAC has higher P/E ratio than MUFG: BAC (12.18) vs MUFG (8.85). MUFG YTD gains are higher at: 13.652 vs. BAC (5.870). BAC has less debt than MUFG: BAC (334B) vs MUFG (48.64T). MUFG has higher revenues than BAC: MUFG (5.66T) vs BAC (98.6B).
BACMUFGBAC / MUFG
Capitalization299B116B258%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.87013.65243%
P/E Ratio12.188.85138%
Revenue98.6B5.66T2%
Total Cash25.3BN/A-
Total Debt334B48.64T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6314
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
424
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2520
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MUFG's Valuation (63) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (74). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAC (42). This means that MUFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (1). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (46). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (25). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
-0.92%
WFC - BAC
77%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
C - BAC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
JPM - BAC
73%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
NTB - BAC
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
BCS - BAC
44%
Loosely correlated
+5.17%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+3.98%
SMFG - MUFG
88%
Closely correlated
+3.04%
C - MUFG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
WFC - MUFG
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
BAC - MUFG
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
RY - MUFG
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More