BAC
Price
$52.90
Change
-$1.21 (-2.24%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
395.14B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JPM
Price
$309.50
Change
-$10.91 (-3.41%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
872.24B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs JPM

Header iconBAC vs JPM Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs JPMBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$52.90
Change-$1.21 (-2.24%)
Volume$234.01K
Capitalization395.14B
JPMorgan Chase & Co
Price$309.50
Change-$10.91 (-3.41%)
Volume$47.33K
Capitalization872.24B
BAC vs JPM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. JPM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a StrongBuy and JPM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $54.11 vs. JPM: $320.41)
Brand notoriety: BAC and JPM are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 117% vs. JPM: 128%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $395.14B vs. JPM: $872.24B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $395.14B. JPM’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $872.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $872.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $142.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileJPM’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • JPM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, JPM is a better buy in the long-term than BAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JPM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JPM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAC is a better buy in the short-term than JPM.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.16% price change this week, while JPM (@Major Banks) price change was +2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2026.

JPM is expected to report earnings on Jan 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.91% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JPM($872B) has a higher market cap than BAC($395B). JPM has higher P/E ratio than BAC: JPM (15.87) vs BAC (14.78). JPM YTD gains are higher at: 36.495 vs. BAC (25.317). BAC has more cash in the bank: 26.7B vs. JPM (23.8B). BAC has less debt than JPM: BAC (361B) vs JPM (485B). JPM has higher revenues than BAC: JPM (175B) vs BAC (105B).
BACJPMBAC / JPM
Capitalization395B872B45%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.31736.49569%
P/E Ratio14.7815.8793%
Revenue105B175B60%
Total Cash26.7B23.8B112%
Total Debt361B485B74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs JPM: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
JPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
318
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2123
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5724
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (78) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (88). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (31). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (1). This means that JPM’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as JPM (23). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to JPM’s over the last 12 months.

JPM's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAC (57). This means that JPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACJPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPLG80.00N/A
N/A
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
BAMY28.14N/A
-0.01%
Brookstone Yield ETF
TGRT44.84-0.07
-0.16%
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
TMAT26.75-0.35
-1.29%
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
IMST21.25-0.52
-2.39%
Bitwise MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
+0.90%
WFC - BAC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
C - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
JPM - BAC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
BK - BAC
73%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More

JPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JPM
1D Price
Change %
JPM100%
+1.52%
BAC - JPM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
C - JPM
81%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
WFC - JPM
81%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
BK - JPM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
BCS - JPM
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
More