It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.22% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.92%.
BAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
BAC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BAC | DIVL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 29 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago62% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIVL has been loosely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DIVL jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DIVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DIVL | 100% | +0.27% | ||
PRU - DIVL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
BLK - DIVL | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
MS - DIVL | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
BAC - DIVL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
ADP - DIVL | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
More |