BABA
Price
$171.90
Change
-$3.57 (-2.03%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
424.77B
48 days until earnings call
HEPS
Price
$2.79
Change
-$0.05 (-1.76%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
925.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BABA vs HEPS

Header iconBABA vs HEPS Comparison
Open Charts BABA vs HEPSBanner chart's image
Alibaba Group Holding
Price$171.90
Change-$3.57 (-2.03%)
Volume$53.88K
Capitalization424.77B
D-Market Electronic Services & Trading
Price$2.79
Change-$0.05 (-1.76%)
Volume$1.48K
Capitalization925.84M
BABA vs HEPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BABA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HEPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BABA vs. HEPS commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BABA is a Buy and HEPS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BABA: $171.90 vs. HEPS: $2.79)
Brand notoriety: BABA: Notable vs. HEPS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BABA: 29% vs. HEPS: 30%
Market capitalization -- BABA: $424.77B vs. HEPS: $925.84M
BABA [@Internet Retail] is valued at $424.77B. HEPS’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $925.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $51.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BABA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHEPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BABA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HEPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BABA and HEPS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BABA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HEPS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BABA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HEPS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BABA is a better buy in the short-term than HEPS.

Price Growth

BABA (@Internet Retail) experienced а +5.58% price change this week, while HEPS (@Internet Retail) price change was -4.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +163.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

BABA is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-2.15% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BABA($425B) has a higher market cap than HEPS($926M). HEPS has higher P/E ratio than BABA: HEPS (106.20) vs BABA (20.23). BABA YTD gains are higher at: 110.444 vs. HEPS (-6.271). BABA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 187B vs. HEPS (3.63B). BABA has more cash in the bank: 416B vs. HEPS (8.91B). HEPS has less debt than BABA: HEPS (2.44B) vs BABA (232B). BABA has higher revenues than HEPS: BABA (1T) vs HEPS (58.8B).
BABAHEPSBABA / HEPS
Capitalization425B926M45,896%
EBITDA187B3.63B5,149%
Gain YTD110.444-6.271-1,761%
P/E Ratio20.23106.2019%
Revenue1T58.8B1,702%
Total Cash416B8.91B4,672%
Total Debt232B2.44B9,528%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BABA: Fundamental Ratings
BABA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BABAHEPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BABA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HEPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NYT57.810.42
+0.73%
New York Times Co
BAYAU11.35N/A
N/A
Bayview Acquisition Corp
FIHL17.39-0.15
-0.86%
Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited
BZAI3.90-0.07
-1.76%
Blaize Holdings Inc
MTEN9.70-0.97
-9.09%
Mingteng International Corp

BABA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BABA has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BABA jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BABA
1D Price
Change %
BABA100%
-0.55%
JD - BABA
74%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
PDD - BABA
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
VIPS - BABA
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
BZUN - BABA
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
RERE - BABA
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
More

HEPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HEPS and AMZN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HEPS and AMZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HEPS
1D Price
Change %
HEPS100%
-1.05%
AMZN - HEPS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
OCG - HEPS
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
MI - HEPS
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
BABA - HEPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
JMIA - HEPS
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.61%
More