AZZTF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.44M
CBULF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
18.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZZTF vs CBULF

Header iconAZZTF vs CBULF Comparison
Open Charts AZZTF vs CBULFBanner chart's image
Aztec Minerals
Price$0.16
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$51.18K
Capitalization16.44M
Gratomic
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$8.6K
Capitalization18.53M
AZZTF vs CBULF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZZTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBULF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZZTF vs. CBULF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZZTF is a Hold and CBULF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AZZTF: $0.16 vs. CBULF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: AZZTF and CBULF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZZTF: 68% vs. CBULF: 48%
Market capitalization -- AZZTF: $16.44M vs. CBULF: $18.53M
AZZTF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $16.44M. CBULF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $18.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZZTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCBULF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZZTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CBULF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AZZTF and CBULF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZZTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBULF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZZTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CBULF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBULF is a better buy in the short-term than AZZTF.

Price Growth

AZZTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.75% price change this week, while CBULF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +178.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBULF($18.5M) has a higher market cap than AZZTF($16.4M). CBULF YTD gains are higher at: 102.806 vs. AZZTF (23.097). AZZTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.7M vs. CBULF (-5.67M). AZZTF has more cash in the bank: 1.37M vs. CBULF (115K). AZZTF has less debt than CBULF: AZZTF (60.7K) vs CBULF (216K). AZZTF (0) and CBULF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AZZTFCBULFAZZTF / CBULF
Capitalization16.4M18.5M89%
EBITDA-1.7M-5.67M30%
Gain YTD23.097102.80622%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.37M115K1,195%
Total Debt60.7K216K28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZZTF vs CBULF: Fundamental Ratings
AZZTF
CBULF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
9396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBULF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as AZZTF (39). This means that CBULF’s stock grew similarly to AZZTF’s over the last 12 months.

CBULF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as AZZTF (100). This means that CBULF’s stock grew similarly to AZZTF’s over the last 12 months.

AZZTF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CBULF (96). This means that AZZTF’s stock grew similarly to CBULF’s over the last 12 months.

CBULF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AZZTF (45). This means that CBULF’s stock grew similarly to AZZTF’s over the last 12 months.

CBULF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AZZTF (100). This means that CBULF’s stock grew similarly to AZZTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZZTFCBULF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZZTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBULF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALID0.01N/A
N/A
Allied Corp.
DOTDF0.97N/A
N/A
DotDigital Group PLC
KGSPF86.92N/A
N/A
Kingspan Group plc.
NPSKF4.50N/A
N/A
NSK Ltd.
FMCCT21.99-0.01
-0.05%
Freddie Mac

AZZTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZZTF and GRSLF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZZTF and GRSLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZZTF
1D Price
Change %
AZZTF100%
+6.17%
GRSLF - AZZTF
29%
Poorly correlated
+6.06%
CBULF - AZZTF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVDF - AZZTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
BQSSF - AZZTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.27%
AGXPF - AZZTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
More

CBULF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBULF and MRRDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBULF and MRRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBULF
1D Price
Change %
CBULF100%
N/A
MRRDF - CBULF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
AZZTF - CBULF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.17%
IE - CBULF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
CHXMF - CBULF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
CAMZF - CBULF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More