AZZ
Price
$112.87
Change
+$0.47 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.39B
40 days until earnings call
LINC
Price
$19.59
Change
+$0.56 (+2.94%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
619.4M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZZ vs LINC

Header iconAZZ vs LINC Comparison
Open Charts AZZ vs LINCBanner chart's image
AZZ
Price$112.87
Change+$0.47 (+0.42%)
Volume$224.66K
Capitalization3.39B
Lincoln Educational Services
Price$19.59
Change+$0.56 (+2.94%)
Volume$337.67K
Capitalization619.4M
AZZ vs LINC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZZ vs. LINC commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZZ is a Hold and LINC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AZZ: $112.87 vs. LINC: $19.59)
Brand notoriety: AZZ and LINC are both not notable
AZZ represents the Office Equipment/Supplies, while LINC is part of the Other Consumer Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZZ: 70% vs. LINC: 94%
Market capitalization -- AZZ: $3.39B vs. LINC: $619.4M
AZZ [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $3.39B. LINC’s [@Other Consumer Specialties] market capitalization is $619.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.54B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLINC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LINC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZZ is a better buy in the long-term than LINC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LINC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LINC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LINC is a better buy in the short-term than AZZ.

Price Growth

AZZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while LINC (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.37%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

AZZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

LINC is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-2.67% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.50% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZZ($3.39B) has a higher market cap than LINC($619M). LINC has higher P/E ratio than AZZ: LINC (42.59) vs AZZ (12.78). AZZ YTD gains are higher at: 38.616 vs. LINC (23.831). AZZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 506M vs. LINC (37.4M). LINC has more cash in the bank: 16.7M vs. AZZ (3.04M). LINC has less debt than AZZ: LINC (189M) vs AZZ (598M). AZZ has higher revenues than LINC: AZZ (1.59B) vs LINC (468M).
AZZLINCAZZ / LINC
Capitalization3.39B619M547%
EBITDA506M37.4M1,353%
Gain YTD38.61623.831162%
P/E Ratio12.7842.5930%
Revenue1.59B468M339%
Total Cash3.04M16.7M18%
Total Debt598M189M316%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZZ vs LINC: Fundamental Ratings
AZZ
LINC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8474
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
815
SMR RATING
1..100
4077
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10062
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZZ's Valuation (67) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as LINC (88) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.

AZZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as LINC (15) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.

AZZ's SMR Rating (40) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LINC (77) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LINC’s over the last 12 months.

AZZ's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as LINC (60) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.

LINC's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZZ (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that LINC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZZLINC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LINC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIREX28.31-0.05
-0.18%
Principal Real Estate Securities Inst
WGMCX30.02-0.07
-0.23%
Wasatch Ultra Growth Institutional
PMDDX19.15-0.05
-0.26%
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Inc C
STSNX41.36-0.21
-0.51%
Sterling Capital SmCp Val A
RFIMX7.39-0.11
-1.47%
Ranger Micro Cap Institutional

AZZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZZ has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZZ jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZZ
1D Price
Change %
AZZ100%
+0.42%
BCO - AZZ
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
GHC - AZZ
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
MSA - AZZ
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
PRSU - AZZ
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
ABM - AZZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
More

LINC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINC has been loosely correlated with UTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LINC jumps, then UTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LINC
1D Price
Change %
LINC100%
+2.94%
UTI - LINC
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
ATGE - LINC
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
AZZ - LINC
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
PRDO - LINC
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
APEI - LINC
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
More