It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCTAS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AZZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -12.90% price change this week, while CTAS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -11.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.40%.
AZZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2025.
CTAS is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.
The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
AZZ | CTAS | AZZ / CTAS | |
Capitalization | 1.94B | 69.7B | 3% |
EBITDA | 307M | 2.34B | 13% |
Gain YTD | 41.895 | 27.712 | 151% |
P/E Ratio | 25.45 | 49.26 | 52% |
Revenue | 1.51B | 9.19B | 16% |
Total Cash | 7.51M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 1B | 2.87B | 35% |
AZZ | CTAS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AZZ's Valuation (64) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CTAS (86) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as AZZ (15) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew similarly to AZZ’s over the last 12 months.
CTAS's SMR Rating (24) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZZ (85) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CTAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZZ’s over the last 12 months.
AZZ's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CTAS (58) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew similarly to CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
AZZ's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTAS (48) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that AZZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTAS’s over the last 12 months.
AZZ | CTAS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago32% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | 3 days ago25% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago40% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago48% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago69% | 11 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago38% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago64% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZZ has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZZ jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTAS has been loosely correlated with RELX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTAS jumps, then RELX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS | 100% | +2.27% | ||
RELX - CTAS | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
ARMK - CTAS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
EFX - CTAS | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
ALLE - CTAS | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
AZZ - CTAS | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
More |