It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZTA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBLFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZTA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BLFS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AZTA (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -10.24% price change this week, while BLFS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -0.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.24%.
AZTA is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
BLFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
AZTA | BLFS | AZTA / BLFS | |
Capitalization | 1.33B | 1.09B | 123% |
EBITDA | 13.8M | 2.72M | 508% |
Gain YTD | -41.940 | -20.493 | 205% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 669M | 87.8M | 762% |
Total Cash | 328M | 88.6M | 370% |
Total Debt | 53.7M | 26.9M | 200% |
AZTA | BLFS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AZTA's Valuation (72) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as BLFS (99) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that AZTA’s stock grew similarly to BLFS’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as AZTA (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BLFS’s stock grew similarly to AZTA’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS's SMR Rating (92) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as AZTA (92) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BLFS’s stock grew similarly to AZTA’s over the last 12 months.
AZTA's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as BLFS (80) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that AZTA’s stock grew similarly to BLFS’s over the last 12 months.
BLFS's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZTA (54) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that BLFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZTA’s over the last 12 months.
AZTA | BLFS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago71% | 26 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago84% | 11 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago82% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
DFIVX | 25.97 | 0.22 | +0.85% |
DFA International Value I | |||
BCVCX | 31.45 | 0.21 | +0.67% |
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq C | |||
JGEFX | 12.94 | 0.06 | +0.47% |
JHancock Global Equity I | |||
FGDMX | 129.67 | 0.38 | +0.29% |
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesA | |||
FTUCX | 58.55 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications C |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZTA has been loosely correlated with MTD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZTA jumps, then MTD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AZTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AZTA | 100% | -0.34% | ||
MTD - AZTA | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
RVTY - AZTA | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
A - AZTA | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
BRKR - AZTA | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.34% | ||
TMO - AZTA | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLFS has been loosely correlated with RGEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLFS jumps, then RGEN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BLFS | 100% | N/A | ||
RGEN - BLFS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
A - BLFS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
RVTY - BLFS | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
TWST - BLFS | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
AZTA - BLFS | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More |