It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZPN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLSAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZPN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AZPN (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while LSAK (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
AZPN is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
LSAK is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
AZPN | LSAK | AZPN / LSAK | |
Capitalization | 13.6B | 234M | 5,812% |
EBITDA | 311M | 19.4M | 1,603% |
Gain YTD | 12.214 | 58.025 | 21% |
P/E Ratio | 62.11 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.06B | 547M | 193% |
Total Cash | 131M | 44.3M | 296% |
Total Debt | 97.6M | 181M | 54% |
AZPN | LSAK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LSAK's Valuation (50) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as AZPN (79). This means that LSAK’s stock grew similarly to AZPN’s over the last 12 months.
AZPN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LSAK (48). This means that AZPN’s stock grew similarly to LSAK’s over the last 12 months.
AZPN's SMR Rating (89) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LSAK (93). This means that AZPN’s stock grew similarly to LSAK’s over the last 12 months.
AZPN's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LSAK (48). This means that AZPN’s stock grew similarly to LSAK’s over the last 12 months.
LSAK's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as AZPN (15). This means that LSAK’s stock grew similarly to AZPN’s over the last 12 months.
AZPN | LSAK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% | 10 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZPN has been loosely correlated with SWI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZPN jumps, then SWI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AZPN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AZPN | 100% | +0.40% | ||
SWI - AZPN | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
DT - AZPN | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
BL - AZPN | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.93% | ||
FTNT - AZPN | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.49% | ||
EEFT - AZPN | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSAK and PRYNF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSAK and PRYNF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSAK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LSAK | 100% | N/A | ||
PRYNF - LSAK | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AZPN - LSAK | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
AKRFF - LSAK | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ROP - LSAK | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
AWRE - LSAK | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
More |