It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLIVE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIVE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AZO (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.57% price change this week, while LIVE (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was -7.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.76%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.32%.
AZO is expected to report earnings on Sep 30, 2025.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Home Improvement Chains (-0.26% weekly)The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.
AZO | LIVE | AZO / LIVE | |
Capitalization | 67.5B | 44.8M | 150,670% |
EBITDA | 4.31B | 36.8M | 11,720% |
Gain YTD | 26.020 | 53.698 | 48% |
P/E Ratio | 27.34 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 18.9B | 455M | 4,154% |
Total Cash | 269M | 6.93M | 3,881% |
Total Debt | 12.2B | 231M | 5,281% |
AZO | LIVE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 29 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LIVE's Valuation (48) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZO (98) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZO’s over the last 12 months.
AZO's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIVE (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AZO’s stock grew significantly faster than LIVE’s over the last 12 months.
LIVE's SMR Rating (93) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as AZO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew similarly to AZO’s over the last 12 months.
AZO's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIVE (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AZO’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIVE’s over the last 12 months.
LIVE's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as AZO (28) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew similarly to AZO’s over the last 12 months.
AZO | LIVE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago49% | 4 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 4 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago61% | 15 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago44% | 4 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago50% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago48% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZO has been closely correlated with ORLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AZO jumps, then ORLY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AZO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AZO | 100% | -0.62% | ||
ORLY - AZO | 77% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
GPC - AZO | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
LOW - AZO | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.09% | ||
KMX - AZO | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
TSCO - AZO | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LIVE and EYE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIVE and EYE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LIVE | 100% | -2.45% | ||
EYE - LIVE | 21% Poorly correlated | -6.33% | ||
FLWS - LIVE | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
TTSH - LIVE | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
AZO - LIVE | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
AN - LIVE | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
More |