It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIVE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIVE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LIVE (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.93% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.09%.
LIVE is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
AZO | LIVE | AZO / LIVE | |
Capitalization | 54.5B | 85.2M | 63,967% |
EBITDA | 4.21B | 34.3M | 12,259% |
Gain YTD | 15.988 | 57.663 | 28% |
P/E Ratio | 22.36 | 21.28 | 105% |
Revenue | 17.8B | 404M | 4,406% |
Total Cash | 304M | 5.57M | 5,459% |
Total Debt | 11.8B | 255M | 4,627% |
AZO | LIVE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LIVE's Valuation (50) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZO (94) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZO’s over the last 12 months.
AZO's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIVE (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AZO’s stock grew significantly faster than LIVE’s over the last 12 months.
LIVE's SMR Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as AZO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew similarly to AZO’s over the last 12 months.
AZO's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LIVE (42) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that AZO’s stock grew similarly to LIVE’s over the last 12 months.
LIVE's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as AZO (26) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew similarly to AZO’s over the last 12 months.
AZO | LIVE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago51% | 4 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago49% | 4 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 4 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago61% | 25 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago43% | 8 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago42% | 4 days ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZO has been closely correlated with ORLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AZO jumps, then ORLY could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that LIVE and EYE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIVE and EYE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LIVE | 100% | N/A | ||
EYE - LIVE | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FLWS - LIVE | 15% Poorly correlated | -4.45% | ||
KIRK - LIVE | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HD - LIVE | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
AZO - LIVE | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
More |