Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs RLBFX
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs RLBFX
Virtus Income & Growth C
Price$9.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.76B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. AZNCX (4.76B). RLBFX (2.00) and AZNCX (1.96) have matching dividends . AZNCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AZNCX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: RLBFX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. AZNCX (3.43). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. AZNCX (-1.36).
| AZNCX | RLBFX | AZNCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.945 | 14.890 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.76B | 265B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 2.00 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.43 | 9.05 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.22 | 51.85 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.36 | 43.90 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.81 | 78.80 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement