Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs RLBFX
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs RLBFX
Virtus Income & Growth C
Price$10.02
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.49
Change-$0.54 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
AZNCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. AZNCX (4.77B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than AZNCX: RLBFX (2.13) vs AZNCX (1.96). AZNCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: AZNCX (19 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: RLBFX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.69 vs. AZNCX (4.18). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.38 vs. AZNCX (-8.36).
| AZNCX | RLBFX | AZNCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.29 | 655% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.316 | 2.503 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.77B | 270B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 2.13 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.18 | 11.69 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.41 | 38.02 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.36 | 37.38 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.39 | 91.94 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers