It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGILD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GILD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AZN (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GILD (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.36%.
AZN is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
GILD is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
AZN | GILD | AZN / GILD | |
Capitalization | 209B | 90.8B | 230% |
EBITDA | 13.4B | 10.5B | 128% |
Gain YTD | 1.903 | 18.271 | 10% |
P/E Ratio | 35.30 | 16.20 | 218% |
Revenue | 45.8B | 27.1B | 169% |
Total Cash | 5.86B | 7.26B | 81% |
Total Debt | 28.6B | 25B | 114% |
AZN | GILD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AZN's Valuation (24) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for GILD (91) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew significantly faster than GILD’s over the last 12 months.
GILD's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as AZN (32) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that GILD’s stock grew similarly to AZN’s over the last 12 months.
GILD's SMR Rating (39) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as AZN (56) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that GILD’s stock grew similarly to AZN’s over the last 12 months.
GILD's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as AZN (60) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that GILD’s stock grew similarly to AZN’s over the last 12 months.
GILD's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for AZN (72) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that GILD’s stock grew significantly faster than AZN’s over the last 12 months.
AZN | GILD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 6 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 3 days ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 3 days ago56% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 3 days ago43% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 3 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 3 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago54% | 3 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago46% | 10 days ago50% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago43% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 3 days ago45% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZN has been loosely correlated with SNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZN jumps, then SNY could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GILD has been loosely correlated with JNJ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GILD jumps, then JNJ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GILD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GILD | 100% | +0.21% | ||
JNJ - GILD | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
BMY - GILD | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
AMGN - GILD | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
AZN - GILD | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
MRK - GILD | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.12% | ||
More |