It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBIIB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BIIB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AZN (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while BIIB (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -6.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.03%.
AZN is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.
BIIB is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
AZN | BIIB | AZN / BIIB | |
Capitalization | 209B | 31.3B | 668% |
EBITDA | 13.4B | 2.04B | 658% |
Gain YTD | 2.122 | -7.645 | -28% |
P/E Ratio | 35.30 | 26.95 | 131% |
Revenue | 45.8B | 9.84B | 466% |
Total Cash | 5.86B | 1.05B | 558% |
Total Debt | 28.6B | 7.34B | 390% |
AZN | BIIB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AZN's Valuation (25) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIIB (84) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
AZN's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIIB (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
AZN's SMR Rating (52) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as BIIB (67) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew similarly to BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
BIIB's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as AZN (75) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that BIIB’s stock grew similarly to AZN’s over the last 12 months.
AZN's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as BIIB (96) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that AZN’s stock grew similarly to BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
AZN | BIIB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago53% | 4 days ago55% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago48% | 4 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago45% | 4 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago55% | 12 days ago54% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago47% | 8 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZN has been loosely correlated with NVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZN jumps, then NVS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that BIIB and OGN have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BIIB and OGN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BIIB | 100% | +0.16% | ||
OGN - BIIB | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
PFE - BIIB | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
NVS - BIIB | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
AZN - BIIB | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
JNJ - BIIB | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.93% | ||
More |