It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AZN (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -4.21% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.74%.
AZN is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
AZN | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AZN | BCIL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago58% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago46% | 1 day ago89% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 1 day ago88% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago54% | 6 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 16 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 1 day ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZN has been loosely correlated with NVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZN jumps, then NVS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCIL has been loosely correlated with STN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCIL jumps, then STN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCIL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BCIL | 100% | -0.13% | ||
STN - BCIL | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
L - BCIL | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
EPR - BCIL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
BA - BCIL | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
AZN - BCIL | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
More |