Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWHX
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWHX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$19.96
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.34M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.26
Change+$0.16 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. AZMCX (15.3M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AZMCX: RNWHX (0.91) vs AZMCX (0.85). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWHX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.23 vs. RNWHX (19.99). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.29 vs. AZMCX (2.61).
| AZMCX | RNWHX | AZMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.72 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.72 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.610 | 26.625 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.3M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.91 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.23 | 19.99 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.42 | 44.35 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.61 | 18.29 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.58 | 94.66 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement