Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWHX
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWHX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$20.30
Change-$0.10 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.25M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. AZMCX (16.2M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AZMCX: RNWHX (0.93) vs AZMCX (0.83). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWHX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.83 vs. RNWHX (15.38). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 29.08 vs. AZMCX (12.19).
| AZMCX | RNWHX | AZMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.72 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.72 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.818 | 24.375 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.2M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.93 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.83 | 15.38 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.97 | 57.29 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.19 | 29.08 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement