Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWHX
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWHX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$20.34
Change-$0.22 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.22
Change-$1.24 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
AZMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. AZMCX (16M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AZMCX: RNWHX (0.90) vs AZMCX (0.82). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWHX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.33 vs. RNWHX (20.99). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 24.39 vs. AZMCX (8.65).
| AZMCX | RNWHX | AZMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.72 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 0.72 | 344% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.078 | 26.572 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16M | 76.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.90 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.33 | 20.99 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.02 | 48.72 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.65 | 24.39 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.05 | N/A | - |