Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWBX
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWBX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$20.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.36M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. AZMCX (15.4M). AZMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZMCX (0.85) vs RNWBX (0.12). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWBX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.19 vs. RNWBX (19.18). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. AZMCX (3.03).
| AZMCX | RNWBX | AZMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.935 | 20.884 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.4M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.12 | 723% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.19 | 19.18 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.53 | 41.02 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.03 | 7.90 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.21 | 82.81 | 87% |