Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWBX
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWBX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$20.30
Change-$0.10 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.25M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
AZMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. AZMCX (16.2M). AZMCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AZMCX (0.83) vs RNWBX (0.12). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWBX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.83 vs. RNWBX (14.20). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.32 vs. AZMCX (12.19).
| AZMCX | RNWBX | AZMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.67 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.818 | 23.440 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.2M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.12 | 688% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.83 | 14.20 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.97 | 54.19 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.19 | 24.32 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.54 | 85.87 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement