Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMCX vs RNWAX
AZMCX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts AZMCX vs RNWAX
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value C
Price$20.34
Change-$0.22 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16M
American Funds New World R1
Price$92.44
Change-$1.20 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
AZMCX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMCX vs. RNWAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. AZMCX (16M). AZMCX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: AZMCX (0.82) vs RNWAX (0.00). AZMCX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: AZMCX (13 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). AZMCX (2.48) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). AZMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 119.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMCX: RNWAX (250) vs AZMCX (2500). AZMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.33 vs. RNWAX (20.34). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.33 vs. AZMCX (8.65).
| AZMCX | RNWAX | AZMCX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.66 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.48 | 1.66 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.078 | 27.176 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16M | 76.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.33 | 20.34 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.02 | 47.05 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.65 | 21.33 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.05 | 93.76 | 74% |