AZMCF
Price
$0.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
59.45M
GRSLF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
108.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZMCF vs GRSLF

Header iconAZMCF vs GRSLF Comparison
Open Charts AZMCF vs GRSLFBanner chart's image
Arizona Metals
Price$0.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$338.01K
Capitalization59.45M
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.25
Change+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization108.24M
AZMCF vs GRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZMCF vs. GRSLF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCF is a Hold and GRSLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AZMCF: $0.44 vs. GRSLF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: AZMCF and GRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZMCF: 72% vs. GRSLF: 111%
Market capitalization -- AZMCF: $59.45M vs. GRSLF: $108.24M
AZMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $59.45M. GRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $108.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRSLF is a better buy in the long-term than AZMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZMCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRSLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRSLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRSLF is a better buy in the short-term than AZMCF.

Price Growth

AZMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.31% price change this week, while GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +17.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRSLF($108M) has a higher market cap than AZMCF($59.5M). GRSLF YTD gains are higher at: 127.186 vs. AZMCF (-60.677). GRSLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.27M vs. AZMCF (-22.05M). AZMCF has more cash in the bank: 25M vs. GRSLF (2.12M). AZMCF (0) and GRSLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AZMCFGRSLFAZMCF / GRSLF
Capitalization59.5M108M55%
EBITDA-22.05M-8.27M267%
Gain YTD-60.677127.186-48%
P/E RatioN/A4.96-
Revenue00-
Total Cash25M2.12M1,178%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRSLF: Fundamental Ratings
GRSLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZMCFGRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AREWX26.030.27
+1.05%
American Century Real Estate R
UIVCX12.780.11
+0.87%
MFS Intrinsic Value C
RPGIX23.570.18
+0.77%
T. Rowe Price Global Industrials
PRPFX72.470.41
+0.57%
Permanent Portfolio Permanent I
VLNPX45.76N/A
N/A
Voya Small Cap Growth R6

AZMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZMCF has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZMCF jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZMCF
1D Price
Change %
AZMCF100%
-1.30%
AAGFF - AZMCF
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
GLNCY - AZMCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
GMBXF - AZMCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
ATUSF - AZMCF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
GRSLF - AZMCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
More

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AGXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AGXPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
+3.54%
AGXPF - GRSLF
44%
Loosely correlated
-8.68%
AAGFF - GRSLF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
AZMCF - GRSLF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
GLNCY - GRSLF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
GMBXF - GRSLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More