AZMCF
Price
$1.23
Change
+$0.01 (+0.82%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
GRSLF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.02 (+15.38%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

AZMCF vs GRSLF

Header iconAZMCF vs GRSLF Comparison
Open Charts AZMCF vs GRSLFBanner chart's image
Arizona Metals
Price$1.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.82%)
Volume$107.6K
CapitalizationN/A
GR SILVER MNG
Price$0.15
Change+$0.02 (+15.38%)
Volume$273.96K
CapitalizationN/A
AZMCF vs GRSLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZMCF vs. GRSLF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCF is a Hold and GRSLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (AZMCF: $1.23 vs. GRSLF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: AZMCF and GRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZMCF: 43% vs. GRSLF: 83%
Market capitalization -- AZMCF: $267.05M vs. GRSLF: $10.86M
AZMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $267.05M. GRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $10.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRSLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AZMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRSLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRSLF is a better buy in the long-term than AZMCF.

Price Growth

AZMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -14.52% price change this week, while GRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.84% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZMCF($267M) has a higher market cap than GRSLF($10.9M). GRSLF YTD gains are higher at: 131.776 vs. AZMCF (-33.461). GRSLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -19.73M vs. AZMCF (-20.96M). AZMCF has more cash in the bank: 48.4M vs. GRSLF (1.49M). AZMCF (0) and GRSLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AZMCFGRSLFAZMCF / GRSLF
Capitalization267M10.9M2,450%
EBITDA-20.96M-19.73M106%
Gain YTD-33.461131.776-25%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash48.4M1.49M3,251%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRSLF: Fundamental Ratings
GRSLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

AZMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZMCF has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZMCF jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZMCF
1D Price
Change %
AZMCF100%
+0.61%
AAGFF - AZMCF
37%
Loosely correlated
+12.52%
GLNCY - AZMCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
GMBXF - AZMCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
ATUSF - AZMCF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
LUNMF - AZMCF
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.01%
More

GRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRSLF has been loosely correlated with AGXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRSLF jumps, then AGXPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRSLF
1D Price
Change %
GRSLF100%
+17.29%
AGXPF - GRSLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+5.60%
AAGFF - GRSLF
42%
Loosely correlated
+12.52%
AZMCF - GRSLF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
GLNCY - GRSLF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
ARREF - GRSLF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
More