AZMCF
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.02 (-3.17%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
267.05M
CGNMF
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.02 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
857.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZMCF vs CGNMF

Header iconAZMCF vs CGNMF Comparison
Open Charts AZMCF vs CGNMFBanner chart's image
Arizona Metals
Price$0.61
Change-$0.02 (-3.17%)
Volume$597.91K
Capitalization267.05M
CGN MINING
Price$0.28
Change+$0.02 (+7.69%)
Volume$18.27K
Capitalization857.81M
AZMCF vs CGNMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZMCF vs. CGNMF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMCF is a Hold and CGNMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AZMCF: $0.61 vs. CGNMF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: AZMCF and CGNMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZMCF: 123% vs. CGNMF: 361%
Market capitalization -- AZMCF: $267.05M vs. CGNMF: $857.81M
AZMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $267.05M. CGNMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $857.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGNMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGNMF is a better buy in the long-term than AZMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZMCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGNMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CGNMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGNMF is a better buy in the short-term than AZMCF.

Price Growth

AZMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.96% price change this week, while CGNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +12.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGNMF($858M) has a higher market cap than AZMCF($267M). CGNMF YTD gains are higher at: 35.560 vs. AZMCF (-45.385). CGNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 623M vs. AZMCF (-20.96M). CGNMF has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. AZMCF (48.4M). CGNMF has higher revenues than AZMCF: CGNMF (4.43B) vs AZMCF (0).
AZMCFCGNMFAZMCF / CGNMF
Capitalization267M858M31%
EBITDA-20.96M623M-3%
Gain YTD-45.38535.560-128%
P/E RatioN/A11.95-
Revenue04.43B-
Total Cash48.4M1.27B4%
Total DebtN/A2.27B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZMCFCGNMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CYPIX72.281.02
+1.43%
ProFunds Consumer Disctnry Ultra Sec Inv
FSBDX21.470.09
+0.42%
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth
SDGTX135.560.51
+0.38%
DWS Capital Growth Institutional
NBSSX35.250.08
+0.23%
Neuberger Berman Focus Investor
FSCVX25.960.04
+0.15%
Nuveen Small Cap Value C

AZMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZMCF has been loosely correlated with AAGFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZMCF jumps, then AAGFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZMCF
1D Price
Change %
AZMCF100%
-3.81%
AAGFF - AZMCF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
GLNCY - AZMCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
GMBXF - AZMCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
ATUSF - AZMCF
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
LUNMF - AZMCF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More

CGNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGNMF and BRIOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGNMF and BRIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGNMF
1D Price
Change %
CGNMF100%
+8.95%
BRIOF - CGNMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUEMF - CGNMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZMCF - CGNMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.81%
BLIDF - CGNMF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTSRF - CGNMF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
More