AZLCZ
Price
$1045.00
Change
+$5.00 (+0.48%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
HBUV
Price
$1.30
Change
+$0.02 (+1.56%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Capitalization
25.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZLCZ vs HBUV

Header iconAZLCZ vs HBUV Comparison
Open Charts AZLCZ vs HBUVBanner chart's image
Aztec Land & Cattle
Price$1045.00
Change+$5.00 (+0.48%)
Volume$15
CapitalizationN/A
Hubilu Venture
Price$1.30
Change+$0.02 (+1.56%)
Volume$309
Capitalization25.97M
AZLCZ vs HBUV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZLCZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZLCZ vs. HBUV commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZLCZ is a Hold and HBUV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AZLCZ: $1045.00 vs. HBUV: $1.30)
Brand notoriety: AZLCZ and HBUV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZLCZ: 61% vs. HBUV: 100%
Market capitalization -- AZLCZ: $0 vs. HBUV: $25.97M
AZLCZ [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. HBUV’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $25.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZLCZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHBUV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AZLCZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HBUV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZLCZ is a better buy in the long-term than HBUV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZLCZ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBUV’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZLCZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HBUV’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBUV is a better buy in the short-term than AZLCZ.

Price Growth

AZLCZ (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while HBUV (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZLCZ YTD gains are higher at: 25.903 vs. HBUV (0.000).
AZLCZHBUVAZLCZ / HBUV
CapitalizationN/A26M-
EBITDAN/A1.09M-
Gain YTD25.9030.000-
P/E RatioN/A131.58-
RevenueN/A1.6M-
Total CashN/A88.5K-
Total DebtN/A16.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZLCZ vs HBUV: Fundamental Ratings
AZLCZ
HBUV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10059
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10057
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZLCZ's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as HBUV (77). This means that AZLCZ’s stock grew similarly to HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

HBUV's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZLCZ (100). This means that HBUV’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZLCZ’s over the last 12 months.

HBUV's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AZLCZ (100). This means that HBUV’s stock grew similarly to AZLCZ’s over the last 12 months.

HBUV's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AZLCZ (46). This means that HBUV’s stock grew similarly to AZLCZ’s over the last 12 months.

HBUV's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZLCZ (100). This means that HBUV’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZLCZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZLCZHBUV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZLCZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEXGF0.040.01
+22.79%
MEXICAN GOLD MNG CORP.
HUSIF0.37N/A
+1.29%
Nicola Mining Inc.
ICAGY9.380.04
+0.43%
International Consolidated Airlines Group SA
EBCOF15.53N/A
N/A
Ebara Corp.
EIHDF0.81N/A
N/A
888 Holdings plc.

AZLCZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZLCZ and GYRO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZLCZ and GYRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZLCZ
1D Price
Change %
AZLCZ100%
N/A
GYRO - AZLCZ
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBUV - AZLCZ
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVGPF - AZLCZ
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
REAX - AZLCZ
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
GDVTZ - AZLCZ
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HBUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBUV has been loosely correlated with FHRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBUV jumps, then FHRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBUV
1D Price
Change %
HBUV100%
N/A
FHRT - HBUV
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GYRO - HBUV
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOKA - HBUV
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWPFF - HBUV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZLCZ - HBUV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More