AZIHF
Price
$43.94
Change
+$4.25 (+10.71%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SII
Price
$115.65
Change
-$8.23 (-6.64%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.18B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZIHF vs SII

Header iconAZIHF vs SII Comparison
Open Charts AZIHF vs SIIBanner chart's image
Azimut Holding Spa
Price$43.94
Change+$4.25 (+10.71%)
Volume$316
Capitalization6.1B
Sprott
Price$115.65
Change-$8.23 (-6.64%)
Volume$106
Capitalization3.18B
AZIHF vs SII Comparison Chart in %
AZIHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZIHF vs. SII commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZIHF is a Hold and SII is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (AZIHF: $43.94 vs. SII: $123.88)
Brand notoriety: AZIHF and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZIHF: 12% vs. SII: 128%
Market capitalization -- AZIHF: $6.1B vs. SII: $3.18B
AZIHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $6.1B. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZIHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AZIHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the long-term than SII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZIHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZIHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the short-term than SII.

Price Growth

AZIHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was -6.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

SII is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.43% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZIHF($6.1B) has a higher market cap than SII($3.18B). SII has higher P/E ratio than AZIHF: SII (63.20) vs AZIHF (10.24). SII YTD gains are higher at: 26.511 vs. AZIHF (-0.521). AZIHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 729M vs. SII (72.2M). AZIHF has more cash in the bank: 486M vs. SII (80.3M). SII has less debt than AZIHF: SII (18.7M) vs AZIHF (57.7M). AZIHF has higher revenues than SII: AZIHF (1.4B) vs SII (199M).
AZIHFSIIAZIHF / SII
Capitalization6.1B3.18B192%
EBITDA729M72.2M1,010%
Gain YTD-0.52126.511-2%
P/E Ratio10.2463.2016%
Revenue1.4B199M701%
Total Cash486M80.3M605%
Total Debt57.7M18.7M309%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZIHF vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
AZIHF
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
457
SMR RATING
1..100
3454
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
165
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3265

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZIHF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SII (82). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew significantly faster than SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZIHF (45). This means that SII’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (54). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as AZIHF (46). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

SII's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as AZIHF (16). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZIHFSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZIHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRUQX15.150.21
+1.41%
PGIM Jennison Utility R6
BRUFX572.195.29
+0.93%
Bruce
TNYRX10.740.05
+0.47%
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income R
PSGCX10.24-0.14
-1.35%
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth C
JRANX86.93-1.85
-2.08%
Janus Henderson Research N

AZIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZIHF and AJMPF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZIHF and AJMPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZIHF
1D Price
Change %
AZIHF100%
N/A
AJMPF - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
-3.33%
BMNM - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - AZIHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
AGFMF - AZIHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
BRSGF - AZIHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with BK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then BK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
+2.72%
BK - SII
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
MAIN - SII
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
BN - SII
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
ARCC - SII
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
SEIC - SII
33%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
More