AZIHF
Price
$38.37
Change
+$4.12 (+12.03%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
4.94B
GMHLF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
134.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZIHF vs GMHLF

Header iconAZIHF vs GMHLF Comparison
Open Charts AZIHF vs GMHLFBanner chart's image
Azimut Holding Spa
Price$38.37
Change+$4.12 (+12.03%)
Volume$371
Capitalization4.94B
Gam Holding AG
Price$0.09
Change+$0.03 (+50.00%)
Volume$65.45K
Capitalization134.55M
AZIHF vs GMHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZIHF vs. GMHLF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZIHF is a Hold and GMHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AZIHF: $38.37 vs. GMHLF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: AZIHF and GMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZIHF: 82% vs. GMHLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AZIHF: $4.94B vs. GMHLF: $134.55M
AZIHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.94B. GMHLF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $134.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZIHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGMHLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AZIHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the long-term than GMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZIHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AZIHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AZIHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GMHLF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZIHF($4.94B) has a higher market cap than GMHLF($135M). AZIHF YTD gains are higher at: 62.585 vs. GMHLF (41.667). AZIHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 723M vs. GMHLF (-57.9M). AZIHF has more cash in the bank: 426M vs. GMHLF (42.7M). GMHLF has less debt than AZIHF: GMHLF (16.5M) vs AZIHF (23.3M). AZIHF has higher revenues than GMHLF: AZIHF (1.35B) vs GMHLF (98.3M).
AZIHFGMHLFAZIHF / GMHLF
Capitalization4.94B135M3,661%
EBITDA723M-57.9M-1,249%
Gain YTD62.58541.667150%
P/E Ratio9.61N/A-
Revenue1.35B98.3M1,368%
Total Cash426M42.7M998%
Total Debt23.3M16.5M141%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZIHF vs GMHLF: Fundamental Ratings
AZIHF
GMHLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51100
SMR RATING
1..100
3499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4079
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZIHF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMHLF (89). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew significantly faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMHLF (100). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMHLF (99). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMHLF (79). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMHLF (96). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew significantly faster than GMHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZIHFGMHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBH10.090.24
+2.44%
Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund
GLV5.820.01
+0.17%
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
FPEI19.210.02
+0.10%
First Trust Instl Pref Secs and Inc ETF
TUSB50.400.04
+0.09%
Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF
VICE35.19-0.12
-0.33%
AdvisorShares Vice ETF

AZIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZIHF and OXSQ have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZIHF and OXSQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZIHF
1D Price
Change %
AZIHF100%
N/A
OXSQ - AZIHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMHLF - AZIHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - AZIHF
14%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
AJMPF - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - AZIHF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More

GMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMHLF and AZIHF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMHLF and AZIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMHLF
1D Price
Change %
GMHLF100%
N/A
AZIHF - GMHLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GMHLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
HCGI - GMHLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAE - GMHLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMPXF - GMHLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More