AZIHF
Price
$37.59
Change
-$0.81 (-2.11%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.19B
BMNM
Price
$1.15
Change
+$0.05 (+4.55%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZIHF vs BMNM

Header iconAZIHF vs BMNM Comparison
Open Charts AZIHF vs BMNMBanner chart's image
Azimut Holding Spa
Price$37.59
Change-$0.81 (-2.11%)
Volume$111
Capitalization5.19B
Bimini Capital Management
Price$1.15
Change+$0.05 (+4.55%)
Volume$956
Capitalization11.58M
AZIHF vs BMNM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BMNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZIHF vs. BMNM commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZIHF is a StrongBuy and BMNM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AZIHF: $37.59 vs. BMNM: $1.15)
Brand notoriety: AZIHF and BMNM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZIHF: 20% vs. BMNM: 24%
Market capitalization -- AZIHF: $5.19B vs. BMNM: $11.58M
AZIHF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.19B. BMNM’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZIHF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBMNM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZIHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BMNM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the long-term than BMNM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZIHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BMNM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZIHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BMNM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AZIHF is a better buy in the short-term than BMNM.

Price Growth

AZIHF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.05% price change this week, while BMNM (@Investment Managers) price change was -8.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AZIHF($5.19B) has a higher market cap than BMNM($11.6M). AZIHF YTD gains are higher at: 59.280 vs. BMNM (15.000). AZIHF has less debt than BMNM: AZIHF (23.3M) vs BMNM (27.4M). AZIHF has higher revenues than BMNM: AZIHF (1.35B) vs BMNM (13.4M).
AZIHFBMNMAZIHF / BMNM
Capitalization5.19B11.6M44,767%
EBITDA723MN/A-
Gain YTD59.28015.000395%
P/E Ratio9.35N/A-
Revenue1.35B13.4M10,037%
Total Cash426MN/A-
Total Debt23.3M27.4M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZIHF vs BMNM: Fundamental Ratings
AZIHF
BMNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5390
SMR RATING
1..100
3395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZIHF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMNM (84). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew significantly faster than BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMNM (90). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BMNM (95). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

AZIHF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BMNM (55). This means that AZIHF’s stock grew similarly to BMNM’s over the last 12 months.

BMNM's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as AZIHF (11). This means that BMNM’s stock grew similarly to AZIHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZIHFBMNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZIHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BMNM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVGLF0.13N/A
+2.54%
LAKE VICTORIA GOLD LTD.
KHOLY21.63N/A
N/A
Koc Holdings A.S.
KOSCF42.22N/A
N/A
Kose Corp.
OLYFF74.94N/A
N/A
Olympia Financial Group, Inc.
NBCDF18.48N/A
N/A
National Bank of Canada

AZIHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZIHF and OXSQ have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZIHF and OXSQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZIHF
1D Price
Change %
AZIHF100%
N/A
OXSQ - AZIHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
GMHLF - AZIHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMNM - AZIHF
14%
Poorly correlated
+4.55%
AJMPF - AZIHF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - AZIHF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
More

BMNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMNM and TURN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMNM and TURN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMNM
1D Price
Change %
BMNM100%
+4.55%
TURN - BMNM
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAIN - BMNM
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
AZIHF - BMNM
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SII - BMNM
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
AHFCF - BMNM
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More