Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWHX
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets Z
Price$12.73
Change+$0.18 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.99M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$90.84
Change+$1.02 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. AZEMX (18M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AZEMX: RNWHX (0.97) vs AZEMX (0.56). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZEMX (12 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AZEMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWHX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). RNWHX (17.34) and AZEMX (16.86) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 27.43 vs. AZEMX (11.23).
| AZEMX | RNWHX | AZEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.72 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.544 | 19.495 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18M | 71.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.97 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.86 | 17.34 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.71 | 39.30 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.23 | 27.43 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement