Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWHX
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets Z
Price$13.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.83M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$96.26
Change+$0.16 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. AZEMX (18.8M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AZEMX: RNWHX (0.91) vs AZEMX (0.52). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZEMX (12 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AZEMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWHX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). AZEMX (20.74) and RNWHX (19.99) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 18.29 vs. AZEMX (2.56).
| AZEMX | RNWHX | AZEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.72 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.100 | 26.625 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.8M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.91 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.74 | 19.99 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.57 | 44.35 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.56 | 18.29 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.25 | 94.66 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement