Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWBX
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWBX
Alger Emerging Markets Z
Price$14.34
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.8M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.29
Change-$0.25 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
AZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. AZEMX (19.8M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than AZEMX: RNWBX (0.48) vs AZEMX (0.34). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AZEMX (12 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). AZEMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWBX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). AZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.86 vs. RNWBX (27.43). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 8.49 vs. AZEMX (-0.95).
| AZEMX | RNWBX | AZEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.67 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.441 | 4.012 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.48 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.86 | 27.43 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.37 | 38.02 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.95 | 8.49 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.06 | 111.70 | 110% |