Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AXMNX vs FSMDX
AXMNX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts AXMNX vs FSMDX
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style N
Price$15.81
Change+$0.07 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.31M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.71
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
AXMNX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AXMNX vs. FSMDX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXMNX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. AXMNX (4.31M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than AXMNX: FSMDX (1.25) vs AXMNX (0.78). AXMNX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: AXMNX (6 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). AXMNX (5.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). AXMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AXMNX: FSMDX (0) vs AXMNX (5000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. AXMNX (-0.49). AXMNX return over 5 years is better than : 71.19 vs. FSMDX (60.77).
| AXMNX | FSMDX | AXMNX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,760% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.17 | 0.03 | 20,680% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.150 | 8.969 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.31M | 45.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.25 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.49 | 6.48 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.56 | 52.66 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.19 | 60.77 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 135.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement