Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AXMNX vs FSMDX
AXMNX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts AXMNX vs FSMDX
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style N
Price$16.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.06M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.68
Change-$0.40 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
AXMNX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AXMNX vs. FSMDX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXMNX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. AXMNX (3.06M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than AXMNX: FSMDX (1.24) vs AXMNX (0.77). AXMNX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: AXMNX (6 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). AXMNX (5.17) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). AXMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than AXMNX: FSMDX (0) vs AXMNX (5000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. AXMNX (4.25). AXMNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.36 vs. FSMDX (49.97).
| AXMNX | FSMDX | AXMNX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.03 | 2,760% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.17 | 0.03 | 20,680% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.816 | 12.116 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06M | 45.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.24 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 5.30 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.61 | 45.03 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.36 | 49.97 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 150.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement