Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AXMNX vs FSMAX
AXMNX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AXMNX vs FSMAX
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style N
Price$16.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.06M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
AXMNX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AXMNX vs. FSMAX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXMNX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. AXMNX (3.06M). AXMNX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: AXMNX (0.77) vs FSMAX (0.43). AXMNX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AXMNX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AXMNX (5.17) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AXMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AXMNX: FSMAX (0) vs AXMNX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. AXMNX (4.25). AXMNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.36 vs. FSMAX (33.85).
| AXMNX | FSMAX | AXMNX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,971% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.17 | 0.04 | 14,771% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.816 | 14.415 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06M | 41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.43 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 7.13 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.61 | 61.85 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.36 | 33.85 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 118.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers