AXDDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.18M
SMOFF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AXDDF vs SMOFF

Header iconAXDDF vs SMOFF Comparison
Open Charts AXDDF vs SMOFFBanner chart's image
Azucar Minerals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.18K
Capitalization4.18M
SONORO GOLD
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$93.79K
Capitalization9.08M
AXDDF vs SMOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AXDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AXDDF vs. SMOFF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXDDF is a Hold and SMOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AXDDF: $0.04 vs. SMOFF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: AXDDF and SMOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AXDDF: 54% vs. SMOFF: 31%
Market capitalization -- AXDDF: $4.18M vs. SMOFF: $9.08M
AXDDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.18M. SMOFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $9.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AXDDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMOFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AXDDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMOFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AXDDF is a better buy in the long-term than SMOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AXDDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMOFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AXDDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SMOFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AXDDF is a better buy in the short-term than SMOFF.

Price Growth

AXDDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.56% price change this week, while SMOFF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMOFF($9.08M) has a higher market cap than AXDDF($4.18M). SMOFF YTD gains are higher at: 82.833 vs. AXDDF (75.926). AXDDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -421.41K vs. SMOFF (-6.89M). AXDDF has more cash in the bank: 1.12M vs. SMOFF (48.7K). AXDDF (0) and SMOFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AXDDFSMOFFAXDDF / SMOFF
Capitalization4.18M9.08M46%
EBITDA-421.41K-6.89M6%
Gain YTD75.92682.83392%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.12M48.7K2,306%
Total DebtN/A2.14M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AXDDF vs SMOFF: Fundamental Ratings
AXDDF
SMOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5079
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
50100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AXDDF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as SMOFF (88). This means that AXDDF’s stock grew similarly to SMOFF’s over the last 12 months.

SMOFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as AXDDF (100). This means that SMOFF’s stock grew similarly to AXDDF’s over the last 12 months.

AXDDF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMOFF (100). This means that AXDDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMOFF’s over the last 12 months.

AXDDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SMOFF (35). This means that AXDDF’s stock grew similarly to SMOFF’s over the last 12 months.

SMOFF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as AXDDF (7). This means that SMOFF’s stock grew similarly to AXDDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AXDDFSMOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AXDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETN353.235.09
+1.46%
Eaton Corp
TENB33.27N/A
N/A
Tenable Holdings
HSHP5.99N/A
N/A
Himalaya Shipping Ltd
OLPX1.50-0.04
-2.60%
Olaplex Holdings
PEPG1.17-0.11
-8.59%
PepGen

AXDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AXDDF and ORZCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AXDDF and ORZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AXDDF
1D Price
Change %
AXDDF100%
+2.57%
ORZCF - AXDDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.05%
SMOFF - AXDDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
AUIAF - AXDDF
3%
Poorly correlated
-10.81%
BCEKF - AXDDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
ORAAF - AXDDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
More

SMOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMOFF and FMANF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMOFF and FMANF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMOFF
1D Price
Change %
SMOFF100%
-2.49%
FMANF - SMOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-11.72%
AXDDF - SMOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
BSXGF - SMOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
SITKF - SMOFF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
SLVTF - SMOFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More