AXAHF
Price
$45.80
Change
-$1.14 (-2.43%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
99.03B
IAFNF
Price
$111.14
Change
+$3.00 (+2.77%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
10.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AXAHF vs IAFNF

Header iconAXAHF vs IAFNF Comparison
Open Charts AXAHF vs IAFNFBanner chart's image
AXA
Price$45.80
Change-$1.14 (-2.43%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization99.03B
IA FINL
Price$111.14
Change+$3.00 (+2.77%)
Volume$676
Capitalization10.04B
AXAHF vs IAFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AXAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IAFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AXAHF vs. IAFNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXAHF is a Hold and IAFNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AXAHF: $45.80 vs. IAFNF: $111.14)
Brand notoriety: AXAHF and IAFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AXAHF: 69% vs. IAFNF: 31%
Market capitalization -- AXAHF: $99.03B vs. IAFNF: $10.04B
AXAHF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $99.03B. IAFNF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $10.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $31.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AXAHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIAFNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AXAHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IAFNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IAFNF is a better buy in the long-term than AXAHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AXAHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IAFNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AXAHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IAFNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IAFNF is a better buy in the short-term than AXAHF.

Price Growth

AXAHF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while IAFNF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-1.00% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AXAHF($99B) has a higher market cap than IAFNF($10B). IAFNF has higher P/E ratio than AXAHF: IAFNF (14.32) vs AXAHF (11.95). AXAHF YTD gains are higher at: 30.670 vs. IAFNF (20.273). AXAHF has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. IAFNF (2.21B). IAFNF has less debt than AXAHF: IAFNF (1.5B) vs AXAHF (76.3B). AXAHF has higher revenues than IAFNF: AXAHF (102B) vs IAFNF (4.95B).
AXAHFIAFNFAXAHF / IAFNF
Capitalization99B10B990%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.67020.273151%
P/E Ratio11.9514.3283%
Revenue102B4.95B2,061%
Total Cash329B2.21B14,907%
Total Debt76.3B1.5B5,104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AXAHF: Fundamental Ratings
AXAHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AXAHFIAFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AXAHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IAFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASIA31.140.41
+1.33%
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
FBND46.320.21
+0.46%
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
OACP23.060.09
+0.41%
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
JCPI48.890.11
+0.23%
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
FHDG32.54-0.01
-0.02%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt Dyn Buffr ETF

AXAHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AXAHF has been loosely correlated with AXAHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AXAHF jumps, then AXAHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AXAHF
1D Price
Change %
AXAHF100%
-2.43%
AXAHY - AXAHF
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
ALIZY - AXAHF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
ARZGY - AXAHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
AGESY - AXAHF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
AEGOF - AXAHF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IAFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IAFNF and AXAHY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IAFNF and AXAHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAFNF
1D Price
Change %
IAFNF100%
N/A
AXAHY - IAFNF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
AXAHF - IAFNF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
MPFRF - IAFNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBSEY - IAFNF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
BLHEY - IAFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More