Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTCX vs FSDPX
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts AWTCX vs FSDPX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water C
Price$17.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets540.67M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$94.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.09M
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTCX is a Buy and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 693M vs. AWTCX (541M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than AWTCX: FSDPX (0.90) vs AWTCX (0.00). AWTCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: AWTCX (18 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). AWTCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. AWTCX (22.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTCX: FSDPX (0) vs AWTCX (2500). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.03 vs. AWTCX (-0.45). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 19.41 vs. AWTCX (-2.77).
| AWTCX | FSDPX | AWTCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.70 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.70 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.624 | 12.696 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 541M | 693M | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.45 | 3.03 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.59 | 1.11 | 503% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.77 | 19.41 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | 43.89 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers