Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTCX vs FSDPX
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts AWTCX vs FSDPX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water C
Price$19.99
Change+$0.12 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets565.98M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$91.19
Change+$0.77 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.09M
AWTCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTCX is a StrongBuy and FSDPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 693M vs. AWTCX (566M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than AWTCX: FSDPX (0.90) vs AWTCX (0.00). AWTCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: AWTCX (18 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). AWTCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. AWTCX (22.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTCX: FSDPX (0) vs AWTCX (2500). AWTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.06 vs. FSDPX (-10.03). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 17.27 vs. AWTCX (9.38).
| AWTCX | FSDPX | AWTCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.70 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.70 | 320% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.322 | 8.508 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 566M | 693M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.06 | -10.03 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.64 | -10.30 | -133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.38 | 17.27 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.95 | 29.72 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers