Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWTAX vs FFGTX
AWTAX vs FFGTX Comparison
Open Charts AWTAX vs FFGTX
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water A
Price$21.82
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets574.79M
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.35
Change-$0.18 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.58M
AWTAX vs FFGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWTAX vs. FFGTX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWTAX is a Hold and FFGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. AWTAX (575M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than AWTAX: FFGTX (1.61) vs AWTAX (0.27). AWTAX was incepted earlier than FFGTX: AWTAX (18 years) vs FFGTX (17 years). AWTAX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. AWTAX (22.00). AWTAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFGTX (4%) vs FFGTX (4%). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWTAX: FFGTX (0) vs AWTAX (2500). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. AWTAX (-1.82). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 108.23 vs. AWTAX (20.99).
| AWTAX | FFGTX | AWTAX / FFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.40 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.40 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.963 | 18.942 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 157% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 575M | 928M | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.61 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | 12.74 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.22 | 21.52 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.99 | 108.23 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.44 | 127.07 | 61% |