AWSL
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
CLPXF
Price
$0.76
Change
+$0.01 (+1.33%)
Updated
May 6 closing price
Capitalization
17.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AWSL vs CLPXF

Header iconAWSL vs CLPXF Comparison
Open Charts AWSL vs CLPXFBanner chart's image
Atlantic Power & Infrastructure
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
China Longyuan Power Group
Price$0.76
Change+$0.01 (+1.33%)
Volume$750
Capitalization17.48B
AWSL vs CLPXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AWSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AWSL vs. CLPXF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWSL is a Hold and CLPXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AWSL: $0.04 vs. CLPXF: $0.76)
Brand notoriety: AWSL and CLPXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AWSL: 1% vs. CLPXF: 110%
Market capitalization -- AWSL: $0 vs. CLPXF: $17.48B
AWSL [@Alternative Power Generation] is valued at $0. CLPXF’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $17.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $7.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AWSL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AWSL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLPXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLPXF is a better buy in the long-term than AWSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AWSL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPXF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AWSL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLPXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLPXF is a better buy in the short-term than AWSL.

Price Growth

AWSL (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while CLPXF (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was +4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Alternative Power Generation (+4.07% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AWSL YTD gains are higher at: 42.629 vs. CLPXF (-6.721).
AWSLCLPXFAWSL / CLPXF
CapitalizationN/A17.5B-
EBITDAN/A10.9B-
Gain YTD42.629-6.721-634%
P/E RatioN/A11.83-
RevenueN/A39.3B-
Total CashN/A19.6B-
Total DebtN/A114B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AWSL vs CLPXF: Fundamental Ratings
AWSL
CLPXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
10077
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLPXF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AWSL (93). This means that CLPXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AWSL’s over the last 12 months.

CLPXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as AWSL (100). This means that CLPXF’s stock grew similarly to AWSL’s over the last 12 months.

CLPXF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as AWSL (100). This means that CLPXF’s stock grew similarly to AWSL’s over the last 12 months.

AWSL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPXF (59). This means that AWSL’s stock grew similarly to CLPXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLPXF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as AWSL (51). This means that CLPXF’s stock grew similarly to AWSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AWSLCLPXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AWSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSPR6.771.03
+17.94%
Jasper Therapeutics
PPBT2.480.08
+3.33%
Purple Biotech Ltd
APG34.330.76
+2.26%
APi Group Corporation
HBNC16.390.27
+1.67%
Horizon Bancorp
AGL2.430.04
+1.67%
agilon health

AWSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AWSL and CLPXF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AWSL and CLPXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AWSL
1D Price
Change %
AWSL100%
-3.85%
CLPXF - AWSL
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRLXF - AWSL
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWPWF - AWSL
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWEN - AWSL
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
CGKEF - AWSL
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLPXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPXF and DNNGY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPXF and DNNGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPXF
1D Price
Change %
CLPXF100%
N/A
DNNGY - CLPXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
DOGEF - CLPXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.91%
AWSL - CLPXF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
CGKEF - CLPXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRLXF - CLPXF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More