Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPYX vs RERBX
AWPYX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPYX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic Advisor
Price$22.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets911.6M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$56.75
Change+$0.14 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
AWPYX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPYX vs. RERBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPYX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. AWPYX (912M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPYX: RERBX (0.23) vs AWPYX (0.00). AWPYX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPYX (29 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPYX (0.79). AWPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). AWPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: AWPYX (0) vs RERBX (250). AWPYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.60 vs. RERBX (10.52). AWPYX return over 5 years is better than : -1.09 vs. RERBX (-11.10).
| AWPYX | RERBX | AWPYX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.048 | 11.603 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 912M | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.60 | 10.52 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.66 | 23.36 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.09 | -11.10 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.69 | 30.04 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement