Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPYX vs RERBX
AWPYX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPYX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic Advisor
Price$22.04
Change-$0.06 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets893.32M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.31
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
AWPYX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPYX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPYX is a Hold and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. AWPYX (893M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPYX: RERBX (0.24) vs AWPYX (0.00). AWPYX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPYX (29 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPYX (0.80). AWPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). AWPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: AWPYX (0) vs RERBX (250). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.91 vs. AWPYX (2.80). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.57 vs. AWPYX (2.42).
| AWPYX | RERBX | AWPYX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.049 | 20.570 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 893M | 138B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 9.91 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.85 | 45.47 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.42 | 9.57 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.55 | 35.83 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement