Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPYX vs RERBX
AWPYX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPYX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic Advisor
Price$23.03
Change+$0.15 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets912.57M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$59.17
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
AWPYX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPYX vs. RERBX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPYX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. AWPYX (913M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPYX: RERBX (2.39) vs AWPYX (0.00). AWPYX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPYX (29 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPYX (0.79). AWPYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). AWPYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: AWPYX (0) vs RERBX (250). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.21 vs. AWPYX (16.61). AWPYX return over 5 years is better than : -2.04 vs. RERBX (-8.35).
| AWPYX | RERBX | AWPYX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.56 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.813 | 4.430 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 913M | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.61 | 18.21 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.82 | 22.90 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.04 | -8.35 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.82 | 55.20 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers