Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPCX vs RERBX
AWPCX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPCX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic C
Price$22.16
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.69M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.97
Change-$0.40 (-0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
AWPCX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPCX vs. RERBX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPCX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. AWPCX (897M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPCX: RERBX (0.23) vs AWPCX (0.00). AWPCX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPCX (31 years) vs RERBX (24 years). AWPCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). AWPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPCX: RERBX (250) vs AWPCX (2500). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.64 vs. AWPCX (7.27). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : -0.10 vs. AWPCX (-6.39).
| AWPCX | RERBX | AWPCX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.56 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.56 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.387 | 22.655 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 897M | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 12.64 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.83 | 31.38 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.39 | -0.10 | 6,347% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.41 | 44.44 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement