Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERGX
AWPAX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERGX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$21.16
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets899.98M
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$62.02
Change+$0.35 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
AWPAX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Buy and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. AWPAX (900M). RERGX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERGX (0.93) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERGX: AWPAX (31 years) vs RERGX (16 years). AWPAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). AWPAX (36.00) and RERGX (35.00) have comparable annual turnover. RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERGX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.06 vs. AWPAX (3.83). RERGX return over 5 years is better than : 13.26 vs. AWPAX (8.79).
| AWPAX | RERGX | AWPAX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.47 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.47 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.195 | 16.046 | 76% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 900M | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 9.06 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.38 | 36.53 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.79 | 13.26 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.21 | 42.19 | 93% |