Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERGX
AWPAX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERGX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$21.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets918.68M
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$60.85
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
AWPAX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Buy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. AWPAX (919M). RERGX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERGX (0.95) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERGX: AWPAX (31 years) vs RERGX (16 years). AWPAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). AWPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RERGX (30.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERGX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). AWPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.44 vs. RERGX (5.66). AWPAX (18.80) and RERGX (18.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AWPAX | RERGX | AWPAX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.47 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.47 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.256 | 13.273 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 919M | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.95 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | 5.66 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.69 | 30.86 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.80 | 18.58 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.60 | 29.35 | 97% |