Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERBX
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$21.18
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets893.32M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$61.72
Change+$0.49 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. AWPAX (893M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERBX (0.23) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPAX (32 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPAX (1.05). AWPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERBX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.24 vs. AWPAX (5.71). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : -1.39 vs. AWPAX (-4.61).
| AWPAX | RERBX | AWPAX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.923 | 20.197 | 54% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 893M | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.71 | 11.24 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.93 | 26.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.61 | -1.39 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.16 | 35.62 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement