Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERBX
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$21.16
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets899.98M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$58.47
Change+$0.30 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Buy and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. AWPAX (900M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERBX (0.25) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPAX (31 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPAX (1.05). AWPAX (36.00) and RERBX (35.00) have comparable annual turnover. RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERBX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.49 vs. AWPAX (3.83). AWPAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.79 vs. RERBX (7.43).
| AWPAX | RERBX | AWPAX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.195 | 14.985 | 81% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 900M | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.83 | 7.49 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.38 | 32.33 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.79 | 7.43 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.21 | 33.45 | 117% |