Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERBX
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$21.36
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets918.68M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$57.18
Change+$0.12 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. AWPAX (919M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERBX (0.25) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPAX (31 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPAX (1.05). AWPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RERBX (30.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERBX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). AWPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.44 vs. RERBX (4.13). AWPAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.80 vs. RERBX (12.48).
| AWPAX | RERBX | AWPAX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.256 | 12.448 | 106% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 919M | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | 4.13 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.69 | 26.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.80 | 12.48 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.60 | 21.39 | 134% |