Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERBX
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$21.37
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets905.69M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$62.96
Change+$0.48 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.09B
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Hold and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. AWPAX (906M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERBX (0.23) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPAX (31 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPAX (1.05). AWPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERBX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.02 vs. AWPAX (8.53). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 6.29 vs. AWPAX (-0.93).
| AWPAX | RERBX | AWPAX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.309 | 23.815 | 56% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 906M | 138B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.53 | 16.02 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.24 | 33.99 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.93 | 6.29 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.03 | 41.87 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement