Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWPAX vs RERBX
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts AWPAX vs RERBX
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
Price$21.64
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets911.6M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$56.75
Change+$0.14 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
AWPAX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWPAX vs. RERBX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWPAX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. AWPAX (912M). RERBX pays higher dividends than AWPAX: RERBX (0.23) vs AWPAX (0.00). AWPAX was incepted earlier than RERBX: AWPAX (32 years) vs RERBX (24 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than AWPAX (1.04). AWPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWPAX: RERBX (250) vs AWPAX (2500). AWPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. RERBX (10.52). AWPAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.52 vs. RERBX (-11.10).
| AWPAX | RERBX | AWPAX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.740 | 11.603 | 127% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 912M | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | 10.52 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.66 | 23.36 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.52 | -11.10 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.67 | 30.04 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement