Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AWGIX vs GFACX
AWGIX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts AWGIX vs GFACX
CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Institutional
Price$41.90
Change+$0.66 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets345.61M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.72
Change+$0.95 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
AWGIX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AWGIX vs. GFACX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWGIX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. AWGIX (346M). AWGIX pays higher dividends than GFACX: AWGIX (2.25) vs GFACX (0.00). AWGIX was incepted earlier than GFACX: AWGIX (18 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than AWGIX (0.92). AWGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than AWGIX: GFACX (250) vs AWGIX (250000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.19 vs. AWGIX (-3.15). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.33 vs. AWGIX (20.94).
| AWGIX | GFACX | AWGIX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.36 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.36 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.314 | 18.758 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 337B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.15 | 10.19 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.00 | 65.54 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.94 | 34.33 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.33 | 79.09 | 69% |