AWCA
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
53.91M
CLILF
Price
$2.09
Change
-$0.01 (-0.48%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AWCA vs CLILF

Header iconAWCA vs CLILF Comparison
Open Charts AWCA vs CLILFBanner chart's image
Awaysis Capital
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$248
Capitalization53.91M
Capitaland Investment
Price$2.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.48%)
Volume$35K
Capitalization10.52B
AWCA vs CLILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AWCA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AWCA vs. CLILF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWCA is a Hold and CLILF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AWCA: $0.14 vs. CLILF: $2.09)
Brand notoriety: AWCA and CLILF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AWCA: 1% vs. CLILF: 200%
Market capitalization -- AWCA: $53.91M vs. CLILF: $10.52B
AWCA [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $53.91M. CLILF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $10.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AWCA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLILF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AWCA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLILF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLILF is a better buy in the long-term than AWCA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AWCA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLILF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AWCA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CLILF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLILF is a better buy in the short-term than AWCA.

Price Growth

AWCA (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -54.84% price change this week, while CLILF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLILF($10.5B) has a higher market cap than AWCA($53.9M). CLILF YTD gains are higher at: 7.860 vs. AWCA (-51.473).
AWCACLILFAWCA / CLILF
Capitalization53.9M10.5B1%
EBITDA-2.47MN/A-
Gain YTD-51.4737.860-655%
P/E RatioN/A30.74-
Revenue284KN/A-
Total Cash134KN/A-
Total Debt8.98MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AWCA: Fundamental Ratings
AWCA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AWCACLILF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AWCA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBRFF0.08N/A
N/A
CARLTON PRECIOUS INC.
CBGPY14.29N/A
N/A
Close Brothers Group Plc
RSMDF16.57N/A
N/A
Resmed Inc.
CHPFF0.78N/A
N/A
Charoen Pokphand Foods plc
MJWNY4.40N/A
N/A
Naked Wines PLC

AWCA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AWCA and FTHM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AWCA and FTHM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AWCA
1D Price
Change %
AWCA100%
N/A
FTHM - AWCA
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.27%
UK - AWCA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
CIGI - AWCA
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
CLILF - AWCA
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHMSF - AWCA
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLILF and ACNDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLILF and ACNDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLILF
1D Price
Change %
CLILF100%
N/A
ACNDF - CLILF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
SWPFF - CLILF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AWCA - CLILF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMH - CLILF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.31%
STHO - CLILF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More