AWCA
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
65.38M
CIGI
Price
$166.61
Change
+$0.75 (+0.45%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.46B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AWCA vs CIGI

Header iconAWCA vs CIGI Comparison
Open Charts AWCA vs CIGIBanner chart's image
Awaysis Capital
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization65.38M
Colliers International Group
Price$166.61
Change+$0.75 (+0.45%)
Volume$115.56K
Capitalization8.46B
AWCA vs CIGI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AWCA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AWCA vs. CIGI commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AWCA is a Hold and CIGI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AWCA: $0.17 vs. CIGI: $166.61)
Brand notoriety: AWCA and CIGI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AWCA: 1% vs. CIGI: 79%
Market capitalization -- AWCA: $65.38M vs. CIGI: $8.46B
AWCA [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $65.38M. CIGI’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $8.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AWCA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCIGI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AWCA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CIGI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIGI is a better buy in the long-term than AWCA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AWCA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIGI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AWCA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CIGI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AWCA is a better buy in the short-term than CIGI.

Price Growth

AWCA (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIGI (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIGI is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.41% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIGI($8.46B) has a higher market cap than AWCA($65.4M). CIGI YTD gains are higher at: 22.675 vs. AWCA (-41.144). CIGI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 624M vs. AWCA (-2.47M). CIGI has more cash in the bank: 183M vs. AWCA (134K). AWCA has less debt than CIGI: AWCA (8.98M) vs CIGI (2.32B). CIGI has higher revenues than AWCA: CIGI (5.17B) vs AWCA (284K).
AWCACIGIAWCA / CIGI
Capitalization65.4M8.46B1%
EBITDA-2.47M624M-0%
Gain YTD-41.14422.675-181%
P/E RatioN/A74.68-
Revenue284K5.17B0%
Total Cash134K183M0%
Total Debt8.98M2.32B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AWCA vs CIGI: Fundamental Ratings
AWCA
CIGI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
982
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8931
SMR RATING
1..100
9976
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AWCA's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CIGI (97) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that AWCA’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.

CIGI's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AWCA (89) in the null industry. This means that CIGI’s stock grew somewhat faster than AWCA’s over the last 12 months.

CIGI's SMR Rating (76) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as AWCA (99) in the null industry. This means that CIGI’s stock grew similarly to AWCA’s over the last 12 months.

CIGI's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as AWCA (65) in the null industry. This means that CIGI’s stock grew similarly to AWCA’s over the last 12 months.

CIGI's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for AWCA (100) in the null industry. This means that CIGI’s stock grew significantly faster than AWCA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AWCACIGI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AWCA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPAR14.850.19
+1.30%
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
IMTB44.310.13
+0.28%
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
FJAN49.310.04
+0.09%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jan
PTEC39.56N/A
N/A
Global X PropTech ETF
DECO39.01N/A
N/A
SPDR Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF

AWCA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AWCA and FTHM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AWCA and FTHM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AWCA
1D Price
Change %
AWCA100%
N/A
FTHM - AWCA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
UK - AWCA
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
CIGI - AWCA
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
CLILF - AWCA
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHMSF - AWCA
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CIGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIGI has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIGI jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIGI
1D Price
Change %
CIGI100%
+0.45%
CBRE - CIGI
79%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
JLL - CIGI
78%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
NMRK - CIGI
75%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
CWK - CIGI
69%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
FSV - CIGI
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
More