It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AVO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSFD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AVO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USFD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AVO (@Food Distributors) experienced а +9.80% price change this week, while USFD (@Food Distributors) price change was -2.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.73%.
AVO is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
USFD is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
AVO | USFD | AVO / USFD | |
Capitalization | 841M | 13.3B | 6% |
EBITDA | 64.4M | 1.4B | 5% |
Gain YTD | 43.211 | 49.064 | 88% |
P/E Ratio | 147.13 | 26.82 | 549% |
Revenue | 999M | 35.6B | 3% |
Total Cash | 39.9M | 269M | 15% |
Total Debt | 257M | 5.2B | 5% |
USFD | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AVO | USFD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago46% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago69% | 3 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 5 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVO has been loosely correlated with BZLFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVO jumps, then BZLFF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AVO | 100% | +17.29% | ||
BZLFF - AVO | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CVGW - AVO | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
SPTN - AVO | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ANDE - AVO | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
PFGC - AVO | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USFD has been closely correlated with PFGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USFD jumps, then PFGC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
USFD | 100% | +1.24% | ||
PFGC - USFD | 76% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
CHEF - USFD | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
SYY - USFD | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
AVO - USFD | 27% Poorly correlated | +17.29% | ||
HFFG - USFD | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.22% | ||
More |