AVO
Price
$11.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
840.95M
78 days until earnings call
MCSHF
Price
$2.18
Change
+$0.08 (+3.81%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AVO vs MCSHF

Header iconAVO vs MCSHF Comparison
Open Charts AVO vs MCSHFBanner chart's image
Mission Produce
Price$11.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization840.95M
Metcash
Price$2.18
Change+$0.08 (+3.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.34B
AVO vs MCSHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AVO vs. MCSHF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVO is a Buy and MCSHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AVO: $11.85 vs. MCSHF: $2.18)
Brand notoriety: AVO and MCSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AVO: 284% vs. MCSHF: 1%
Market capitalization -- AVO: $840.95M vs. MCSHF: $2.34B
AVO [@Food Distributors] is valued at $840.95M. MCSHF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AVO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCSHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AVO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AVO and MCSHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AVO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCSHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AVO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCSHF is a better buy in the short-term than AVO.

Price Growth

AVO (@Food Distributors) experienced а -5.65% price change this week, while MCSHF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

AVO is expected to report earnings on Sep 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+3.10% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSHF($2.34B) has a higher market cap than AVO($841M). AVO has higher P/E ratio than MCSHF: AVO (147.13) vs MCSHF (13.61). MCSHF YTD gains are higher at: -1.580 vs. AVO (-17.537). MCSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 558M vs. AVO (64.4M). MCSHF has more cash in the bank: 107M vs. AVO (39.9M). AVO has less debt than MCSHF: AVO (257M) vs MCSHF (1.32B). MCSHF has higher revenues than AVO: MCSHF (15.8B) vs AVO (999M).
AVOMCSHFAVO / MCSHF
Capitalization841M2.34B36%
EBITDA64.4M558M12%
Gain YTD-17.537-1.5801,110%
P/E Ratio147.1313.611,081%
Revenue999M15.8B6%
Total Cash39.9M107M37%
Total Debt257M1.32B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCSHF: Fundamental Ratings
MCSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AVOMCSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXHAX12.570.05
+0.40%
Empower Large Cap Value Inv II
WWLAX13.850.05
+0.36%
Westwood Quality Value Fund A
PAINX8.630.03
+0.35%
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps Z
SWSCX19.000.05
+0.26%
Schwab Small-Cap Equity
ITRIX29.950.06
+0.20%
VY® T. Rowe Price Capital Apprec I

AVO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVO has been loosely correlated with CVGW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVO jumps, then CVGW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AVO
1D Price
Change %
AVO100%
N/A
CVGW - AVO
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
BZLFF - AVO
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SYY - AVO
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
SPTN - AVO
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
PFGC - AVO
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More

MCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCSHF and OGOFF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCSHF and OGOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCSHF
1D Price
Change %
MCSHF100%
N/A
OGOFF - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
MTTWF - MCSHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - MCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVO - MCSHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More