It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AVNS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLFWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AVNS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFWD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AVNS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +2.05% price change this week, while LFWD (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -12.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.35%.
AVNS is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.
LFWD is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| AVNS | LFWD | AVNS / LFWD | |
| Capitalization | 623M | 10.6M | 5,877% |
| EBITDA | -439.1M | -15.98M | 2,748% |
| Gain YTD | 19.501 | -0.277 | -7,028% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.11 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 700M | 24.5M | 2,857% |
| Total Cash | 70.5M | 1.96M | 3,604% |
| Total Debt | 134M | 237K | 56,540% |
AVNS | LFWD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LFWD's Valuation (26) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AVNS (88). This means that LFWD’s stock grew somewhat faster than AVNS’s over the last 12 months.
LFWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as AVNS (100). This means that LFWD’s stock grew similarly to AVNS’s over the last 12 months.
AVNS's SMR Rating (97) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as LFWD (99). This means that AVNS’s stock grew similarly to LFWD’s over the last 12 months.
AVNS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as LFWD (64). This means that AVNS’s stock grew similarly to LFWD’s over the last 12 months.
AVNS's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as LFWD (100). This means that AVNS’s stock grew similarly to LFWD’s over the last 12 months.
| AVNS | LFWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 23 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVNS has been loosely correlated with ENOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVNS jumps, then ENOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVNS | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| ENOV - AVNS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| UTMD - AVNS | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| AZTA - AVNS | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| STE - AVNS | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| CNMD - AVNS | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||