AVGV | GCOW | AVGV / GCOW | |
Gain YTD | 11.849 | 17.924 | 66% |
Net Assets | 153M | 2.42B | 6% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 0.60 | 43% |
Turnover | 8.00 | 49.00 | 16% |
Yield | 2.25 | 2.79 | 81% |
Fund Existence | 2 years | 9 years | - |
AVGV | GCOW | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago62% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago81% | 5 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GCOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW | 100% | -0.46% | ||
BHP - GCOW | 72% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
SHEL - GCOW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
RIO - GCOW | 68% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
E - GCOW | 66% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
ENB - GCOW | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More |