It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AVD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCTVA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AVD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTVA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AVD (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +0.20% price change this week, while CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +4.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +6.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.59%.
AVD is expected to report earnings on Mar 16, 2026.
CTVA is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| AVD | CTVA | AVD / CTVA | |
| Capitalization | 145M | 44.7B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -80.75M | 3.46B | -2% |
| Gain YTD | 8.639 | 17.596 | 49% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.48 | 26.80 | 76% |
| Revenue | 529M | 17.2B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 14.5M | 2.14B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 209M | 3.63B | 6% |
AVD | CTVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AVD's Valuation (55) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CTVA (56) in the null industry. This means that AVD’s stock grew similarly to CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AVD (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew significantly faster than AVD’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as AVD (97) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to AVD’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as AVD (59) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to AVD’s over the last 12 months.
AVD's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CTVA (95) in the null industry. This means that AVD’s stock grew similarly to CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
| AVD | CTVA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 29 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 54% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LSEQ | 29.01 | 0.07 | +0.23% |
| Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF | |||
| FLSP | 27.10 | 0.05 | +0.20% |
| Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF | |||
| DFSV | 31.82 | 0.05 | +0.16% |
| Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | |||
| QNXT | 27.60 | -0.08 | -0.27% |
| iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | |||
| FNGG | 255.25 | -3.14 | -1.22% |
| Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that AVD and CTVA have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AVD and CTVA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVD | 100% | +3.29% | ||
| CTVA - AVD | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| IPI - AVD | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| BIOX - AVD | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.11% | ||
| SMG - AVD | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| MOS - AVD | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTVA has been loosely correlated with MOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTVA jumps, then MOS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTVA | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| MOS - CTVA | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| IPI - CTVA | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| NTR - CTVA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| CF - CTVA | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| FMC - CTVA | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||