AVBH
Price
$26.43
Change
+$0.23 (+0.88%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
289.43M
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLG
Price
$12.74
Change
+$0.27 (+2.17%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.3B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AVBH vs FLG

Header iconAVBH vs FLG Comparison
Open Charts AVBH vs FLGBanner chart's image
Avidbank Holdings
Price$26.43
Change+$0.23 (+0.88%)
Volume$27.27K
Capitalization289.43M
Flagstar Bank National Association
Price$12.74
Change+$0.27 (+2.17%)
Volume$4.74M
Capitalization5.3B
AVBH vs FLG Comparison Chart in %
AVBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AVBH vs. FLG commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVBH is a StrongBuy and FLG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AVBH: $26.25 vs. FLG: $12.47)
Brand notoriety: AVBH and FLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AVBH: 115% vs. FLG: 36%
Market capitalization -- AVBH: $289.43M vs. FLG: $5.3B
AVBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $289.43M. FLG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AVBH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AVBH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AVBH is a better buy in the long-term than FLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AVBH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AVBH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AVBH is a better buy in the short-term than FLG.

Price Growth

AVBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.90% price change this week, while FLG (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

AVBH is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.

FLG is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($5.3B) has a higher market cap than AVBH($289M). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 33.936 vs. AVBH (20.413).
AVBHFLGAVBH / FLG
Capitalization289M5.3B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.41333.93660%
P/E Ratio9.93N/A-
RevenueN/A2.15B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A13.2B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AVBH vs FLG: Fundamental Ratings
AVBH
FLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4775
SMR RATING
1..100
611
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5043

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLG's Valuation (20) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for AVBH (94) in the null industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew significantly faster than AVBH’s over the last 12 months.

AVBH's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FLG (75) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AVBH’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

AVBH's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FLG (11) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AVBH’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

AVBH's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FLG (53) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AVBH’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

AVBH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLG (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AVBH’s stock grew significantly faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AVBHFLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AVBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNPCF14.50N/A
N/A
Dai Nippon Printing Co. Ltd.
ETCMY0.85N/A
N/A
Eutelsat Communications
NZMEF0.35N/A
N/A
Nzme Ltd.
RCRUY10.27N/A
N/A
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
INVRD0.22N/A
N/A
Inverite Insights Inc.

AVBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVBH has been loosely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVBH jumps, then RF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AVBH
1D Price
Change %
AVBH100%
-0.11%
RF - AVBH
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
MFG - AVBH
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
FLG - AVBH
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
FHB - AVBH
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
FBIZ - AVBH
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been closely correlated with VLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then VLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+0.44%
VLY - FLG
68%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
FRME - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
CNOB - FLG
66%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
AUB - FLG
66%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
SNV - FLG
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
More