AVAL
Price
$2.88
Change
-$0.03 (-1.03%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.62B
51 days until earnings call
BKUT
Price
$506.00
Change
+$6.00 (+1.20%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
72M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AVAL vs BKUT

Header iconAVAL vs BKUT Comparison
Open Charts AVAL vs BKUTBanner chart's image
Grupo Aval Acciones Y Valores SA
Price$2.88
Change-$0.03 (-1.03%)
Volume$4.44K
Capitalization2.62B
Bank of Utica (NY)
Price$506.00
Change+$6.00 (+1.20%)
Volume$2
Capitalization72M
AVAL vs BKUT Comparison Chart
Loading...
AVAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AVAL vs. BKUT commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AVAL is a Hold and BKUT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (AVAL: $2.91 vs. BKUT: $506.00)
Brand notoriety: AVAL and BKUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AVAL: 345% vs. BKUT: 29%
Market capitalization -- AVAL: $2.62B vs. BKUT: $72M
AVAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.62B. BKUT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AVAL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBKUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AVAL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BKUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AVAL is a better buy in the long-term than BKUT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AVAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AVAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AVAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.34% price change this week, while BKUT (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

AVAL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.75% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AVAL($2.62B) has a higher market cap than BKUT($72M). AVAL YTD gains are higher at: 47.150 vs. BKUT (-6.470). AVAL has higher revenues than BKUT: AVAL (15.85T) vs BKUT (-5.42M).
AVALBKUTAVAL / BKUT
Capitalization2.62B72M3,633%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD47.150-6.470-729%
P/E Ratio12.61N/A-
Revenue15.85T-5.42M-292,688,331%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AVAL vs BKUT: Fundamental Ratings
AVAL
BKUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
185
SMR RATING
1..100
191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9550
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKUT's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as AVAL (31) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BKUT’s stock grew similarly to AVAL’s over the last 12 months.

AVAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BKUT (85) in the null industry. This means that AVAL’s stock grew significantly faster than BKUT’s over the last 12 months.

AVAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BKUT (91) in the null industry. This means that AVAL’s stock grew significantly faster than BKUT’s over the last 12 months.

AVAL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BKUT (54) in the null industry. This means that AVAL’s stock grew similarly to BKUT’s over the last 12 months.

BKUT's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AVAL (95) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BKUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AVAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AVAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AVAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMGYX29.60-0.30
-1.00%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I3
TIGRX14.78-0.19
-1.27%
Nuveen Core Equity R6
TDFCX8.09-0.11
-1.34%
Transamerica Sustainable Equity Inc C
AFGZX30.23-0.42
-1.37%
Alger Global Equity Z
VEUCX33.50-0.50
-1.47%
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic C

AVAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVAL has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVAL jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AVAL
1D Price
Change %
AVAL100%
+3.56%
CIB - AVAL
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
BCH - AVAL
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
BSAC - AVAL
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
DB - AVAL
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
BAP - AVAL
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More

BKUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKUT and CCBC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKUT and CCBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKUT
1D Price
Change %
BKUT100%
N/A
CCBC - BKUT
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
FFMR - BKUT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVAL - BKUT
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
BSPA - BKUT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCN - BKUT
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More