AUVGF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.20 (-74.07%)
Updated
Mar 4 closing price
Capitalization
65.86M
VDKB
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.01 (+1.01%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
33.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUVGF vs VDKB

Header iconAUVGF vs VDKB Comparison
Open Charts AUVGF vs VDKBBanner chart's image
Australian Vintage
Price$0.07
Change-$0.20 (-74.07%)
Volume$450
Capitalization65.86M
Vodka Brands
Price$1.00
Change+$0.01 (+1.01%)
Volume$341
Capitalization33.35M
AUVGF vs VDKB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
VDKB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUVGF vs. VDKB commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUVGF is a Hold and VDKB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (AUVGF: $0.07 vs. VDKB: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: AUVGF and VDKB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUVGF: 100% vs. VDKB: 83%
Market capitalization -- AUVGF: $65.86M vs. VDKB: $33.35M
AUVGF [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $65.86M. VDKB’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $33.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUVGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVDKB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUVGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VDKB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUVGF is a better buy in the long-term than VDKB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VDKB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VDKB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

AUVGF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VDKB (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+1.12% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUVGF($65.9M) has a higher market cap than VDKB($33.4M). VDKB YTD gains are higher at: -6.799 vs. AUVGF (-72.717). AUVGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.03M vs. VDKB (-91.98K). AUVGF has more cash in the bank: 7.66M vs. VDKB (2.66K). VDKB has less debt than AUVGF: VDKB (56.1K) vs AUVGF (132M). AUVGF has higher revenues than VDKB: AUVGF (256M) vs VDKB (42.8K).
AUVGFVDKBAUVGF / VDKB
Capitalization65.9M33.4M197%
EBITDA4.03M-91.98K-4,383%
Gain YTD-72.717-6.7991,070%
P/E Ratio24.37N/A-
Revenue256M42.8K598,131%
Total Cash7.66M2.66K288,145%
Total Debt132M56.1K235,294%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUVGF vs VDKB: Fundamental Ratings
AUVGF
VDKB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8878
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUVGF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VDKB (87). This means that AUVGF’s stock grew significantly faster than VDKB’s over the last 12 months.

AUVGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VDKB (100). This means that AUVGF’s stock grew similarly to VDKB’s over the last 12 months.

AUVGF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as VDKB (100). This means that AUVGF’s stock grew similarly to VDKB’s over the last 12 months.

VDKB's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as AUVGF (88). This means that VDKB’s stock grew similarly to AUVGF’s over the last 12 months.

AUVGF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VDKB (100). This means that AUVGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VDKB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUVGFVDKB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VDKB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFRHF186.272.09
+1.14%
Compagnie Financiere Richemont AG
ZAIRF0.03N/A
N/A
ABOUND ENERGY INC.
DITTF104.86N/A
N/A
Daito Trust Construction Co.
JPSWF47.01N/A
N/A
The Japan Steel Works, Ltd.
RRTS2.82-0.05
-1.74%
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.

AUVGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUVGF has been loosely correlated with ROYUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AUVGF jumps, then ROYUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUVGF
1D Price
Change %
AUVGF100%
N/A
ROYUF - AUVGF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CATWF - AUVGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSAU - AUVGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDVGF - AUVGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VDKB - AUVGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VDKB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VDKB and STBFY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VDKB and STBFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VDKB
1D Price
Change %
VDKB100%
N/A
STBFY - VDKB
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
TBVPF - VDKB
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TSRYF - VDKB
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
TSGTF - VDKB
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDWBY - VDKB
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
More