Advertisement
AUSTF vs EPIPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUSTF is a Hold and EPIPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AUSTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEPIPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AUSTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EPIPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AUSTF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPIPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AUSTF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
- EPIPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
AUSTF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -35.27% price change this week, while EPIPF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.21%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+2.64% weekly)The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
| AUSTF | EPIPF | AUSTF / EPIPF | |
| Capitalization | 104M | 28B | 0% |
| EBITDA | 41.7M | 14.9B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -13.733 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 4.51 | 24.79 | 18% |
| Revenue | 379M | 63.2B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 20.1M | 11.3B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 52.3M | 21.6B | 0% |
AUSTF | EPIPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 36 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AUSTF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EPIPF (75). This means that AUSTF’s stock grew significantly faster than EPIPF’s over the last 12 months.
EPIPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as AUSTF (86). This means that EPIPF’s stock grew similarly to AUSTF’s over the last 12 months.
EPIPF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as AUSTF (48). This means that EPIPF’s stock grew similarly to AUSTF’s over the last 12 months.
AUSTF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as EPIPF (47). This means that AUSTF’s stock grew similarly to EPIPF’s over the last 12 months.
EPIPF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUSTF (97). This means that EPIPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUSTF’s over the last 12 months.
| AUSTF | EPIPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 25% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 8% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 20% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 13% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 21% | 3 days ago 12% |
Advertisement
AUSTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AUSTF and UGRO have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUSTF and UGRO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AUSTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUSTF | 100% | -19.00% | ||
| UGRO - AUSTF | 6% Poorly correlated | -6.84% | ||
| XOS - AUSTF | -0% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
| EPIPF - AUSTF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MAOIF - AUSTF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HYFM - AUSTF | -1% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
More | ||||
EPIPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EPIPF and KUBTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EPIPF and KUBTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPIPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPIPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KUBTF - EPIPF | 21% Poorly correlated | -9.09% | ||
| XOS - EPIPF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
| TRATF - EPIPF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AUSTF - EPIPF | -0% Poorly correlated | -19.00% | ||
| MAOIF - EPIPF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||